<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MochiKit 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/10/24/mochikit-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/10/24/mochikit-10/</link>
	<description>Bob's Rants</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Grossberg</title>
		<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/10/24/mochikit-10/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Grossberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bob.pythonmac.org/?p=183#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Congrats on hitting 1.0 (even though it's sorta arbitrary).

It's weird that Apple devs woulnd't have looked at the 0.5 test case for Number.toFixed().

And I really, really like the style of the interpreter (i.e. blue "&#62;&#62;&#62;" prompt and black output) and how there is the up/down arrow functionality; it really lends an air of familiarity. It's also sweet how MochiRegExp bolds the matching part of "input".

Too many people blow off details like those as some kind of "fluff", but usability matters. The fact it's a polished release and you've developed those tools makes it that much more likely to be adopted.

Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on hitting 1.0 (even though it&#8217;s sorta arbitrary).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s weird that Apple devs woulnd&#8217;t have looked at the 0.5 test case for Number.toFixed().</p>
<p>And I really, really like the style of the interpreter (i.e. blue &#8220;&gt;&gt;&gt;&#8221; prompt and black output) and how there is the up/down arrow functionality; it really lends an air of familiarity. It&#8217;s also sweet how MochiRegExp bolds the matching part of &#8220;input&#8221;.</p>
<p>Too many people blow off details like those as some kind of &#8220;fluff&#8221;, but usability matters. The fact it&#8217;s a polished release and you&#8217;ve developed those tools makes it that much more likely to be adopted.</p>
<p>Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
