<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fix Mac OS X 10.3&#8217;s Python 2.3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/04/fix-mac-os-x-103s-python-230/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/04/fix-mac-os-x-103s-python-230/</link>
	<description>Bob's Rants</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jorjun</title>
		<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/04/fix-mac-os-x-103s-python-230/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>jorjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=102#comment-203</guid>
		<description>I wish you worked for Apple Bob. They should get fully behind Python and invest in making a Python oriented development environment. More applications for the Mac = more revenue.  Maybe it is still too early to make the business case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you worked for Apple Bob. They should get fully behind Python and invest in making a Python oriented development environment. More applications for the Mac = more revenue.  Maybe it is still too early to make the business case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ippolito</title>
		<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/04/fix-mac-os-x-103s-python-230/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ippolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 06:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=102#comment-125</guid>
		<description>(a) I'd make a very large wager that they will not ever patch Python 2.3.0 for Mac OS X 10.3.x (but not large enough to where it would be profitable if you split it with Apple, of course).  They screwed up Perl and Python on Mac OS X 10.2 and never fixed that, for example.  Their track record says that they only fix things if it has immediate security implications.

(b) If they did, it would be identical to this and thus have no effect if this patch was already installed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(a) I&#8217;d make a very large wager that they will not ever patch Python 2.3.0 for Mac OS X 10.3.x (but not large enough to where it would be profitable if you split it with Apple, of course).  They screwed up Perl and Python on Mac OS X 10.2 and never fixed that, for example.  Their track record says that they only fix things if it has immediate security implications.</p>
<p>(b) If they did, it would be identical to this and thus have no effect if this patch was already installed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Peress</title>
		<link>http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2005/02/04/fix-mac-os-x-103s-python-230/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Peress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=102#comment-124</guid>
		<description>What if apple eventually makes its own patch.  How do you think this here fix will play with that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if apple eventually makes its own patch.  How do you think this here fix will play with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
